seldear: (Default)
[personal profile] seldear
Inspired by a rant by Robin Hobb which [livejournal.com profile] chiroho linked on his LJ.

It's interesting to read another author's opinion of fanfiction. Particularly one whose books I've read. (I didn't much enjoy Robin Hobb's works: convoluted, dragged on too long, she whumped her main character over and over and over, but I know people who love her stuff.)

I'm in agreement with the people who feel that there is no such thing as a single creative vision. An author who writes holistically will write something with a broader scope than a single creative idea and if they write it well, fans will pick up on it and elaborate on those ideas.

Are fanfics self-masturbatory? You betcha! Every single one of them is written for the gratification of someone who is not the author/copyright holder for the original work. In the majority of cases, I'd venture to say that what is written is something that the original author would never write themselves, for whatever reason: not enough time, that's not how they see the characters, or they never even conceived such a scenario.

The justifications for writing fanfiction are many. There are some people who want to see characters in roles and positions that the author will never write, so they write it themselves. There are people who have creative instincts that can't encompass full novels from the point 'go', so they start with someone smaller. And there are people who need to use someone else's creativity to kick-start their own, so they borrow someone else's creations.

One thing that I always remember when reading these rants is that a published author has a vested interest in retaining ownership of their own work, and frequently a concern over liability if they do write a story along the lines of a fan work. (One more reason why Harry/Draco will never, ever happen. Too much fanfic.) For show writers and actors, it's a little blurrier, since they don't actually 'own' the characters although they may be associated with them. Then, too, the characters are more usually defined by the studio/production company, so the show writers don't even own them themselves.

Should I ever be published, I hope to be able to say in all equanimity (?): I haven't read the fanfiction for my characters, and I never will. There are surely stories out there that I would never condone, written by people who shouldn't be allowed near the written word on pain of death; but I'm fairly certain that there are works out there that would make me weep to read, and beg to be a better writer myself. I'm honoured that my characters have caught your imagination, but encourage you to move out of using someone else's works and creating your own worlds and universes. You have aspects of creativity that I don't and never will. I don't encourage you to write fanfiction, but if you must, then find your stride in it, then branch out into your own work and wow me.

And what you should remember when reading this essay is that I am a writer who found her stride in fanfiction. So I'm never going to say that I think that fanfiction is the devil's work. However, as a writer who's trying to get out of it, I will concede that it's a waste of time. A pleasurable waste of time, yes, but a waste of time nevertheless.

Date: 2005-06-28 12:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alliesings.livejournal.com
Which also makes me wonder how these authors who feel so strongly against fanfiction view the world of the Trek books, Stargate books, or any of the numerous series that build on the characters of a TV show or movie. Or since it's been 'approved' by TPTB, it isn't the 'great evil'? Just a thought.

Although that particular ranter seemed to think those books are okay because they have the permission of TPTB, I think that often the "official" books are watered-down versions of what they could be without the constraints of TPTB. With notable exceptions such as Peter David, the novelizers often lack the ability to really break out and take the characters to places we've never been able to explore on the show. The novels are just supposed to be "more episodes", and I haven't read any of the new SG novels yet, but I've read lots of Trek novels, and while the stories are often interesting, they don't offer the power that I've found in some fanfic.

Date: 2005-06-28 12:10 am (UTC)
ext_40147: (Default)
From: [identity profile] sjhw-tolerance.livejournal.com
I must've missed in her essay where she addresses these types of books. And yes, those books do have to be approved by TPTB. But...(and just to be argumentative)...the authors are still technically using characters that they didn't create and putting them into situations they did create--which may or may not have been within the original intent of the creator/author.

I just find it interesting that 'officially sanctioned' fanfic, so to speak, is apparently okay while the other isn't.

Date: 2005-06-28 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alliesings.livejournal.com
Well, I think her deal is that sanctioned novels don't interfere with the creative vision of the original work.

[lengthy, pointless examples omitted]

Profile

seldear: (Default)
seldear

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 11th, 2026 08:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios