seldear: (Default)
So, I'm subscribed to "Etiquette Hell" which is a site that showcases the best and worst of humanity in all their rule-bound and rule-breaking glory.

And in the comments of one of the posts from the last month, I found this group of people saying it was impolite to host your own birthday party. Basically, that it was bigheaded, and saying "I am an awesome person, let's celebrate ME!"

To which I was (as pretty much everyone else who responded to this post): "...wtf, mate?"

However, as someone has pointed out, the issues seem to be around several points of etiquette:

1. That the party is a Big Deal - lots and lots of people, not just 'close friends'.
2. That birthday parties are for children, not adults, and that there's an element of "being the centre of the universe" - possibly not unrelated to the feeling behind the Bridezilla mentality: this day is all about ME!
3. The assumption that gifts are expected as part of your presence at the party.

Added up, throwing your own party can be seen as greedy and self-centered.

Certainly this isn't going to change my attempts to draw people together for something to celebrate my birthday, but it's an interesting insight into...well, social attitudes, expectations, and mentality.
seldear: (Default)
So, my cousin T (with the cancer) is dying.

Her oncology report indicates that the tumours have tripled in number since the last scan. She's asking for things to do with her family for her 'last summer in Sydney'.

Death is not the end for us - we know this in our hearts and it's a great relief and comfort.

But it's still difficult.
seldear: (Default)
I know most people around here only follow me for fandom, so I'm sorry I have nothing for you. The house and move and all the life changes are just too much for me to manage anything as involved as writing.

It's been a rather wordless year for me - I've written as much in the last three months as I was wont to write in a month in previous years. It's just the way things turned out.

A lot of "friends" have drifted or abandoned me, and while some old ones (vintage, in internet tearms) have reconnected, the developments of life-beyond-fandom in their lives as well as mine - to say nothing of fandom drift - mean we don't hang out the way we used to.

It's a life stage thing, but sometimes it still makes me kind of nostalgic.

I'll sign up for Yuletide, but that's easy enough. I'm debating whether or not to run the Pacific Rim Secret Santa again, because I haven't actually written anything in that fandom for a while.

Life is boxes and logistics and exhaustion and not enough sleep.

B2 moves tomorrow (her furniture). B1 and I move on Saturday. We'll all be sleeping here until Saturday, and then...

I left my childhood behind when I was 18 and moved out of home. By choice, on a positive note, and with the assurance that my family would always be there for me if I needed to come back. As it turned out, I kind of got called back when my mother remarried and asked if I'd move back in to keep an eye on the sistren.

Still, this house has always been 'home' just as much as anywhere else I lived. More because of the people who were here, not just the building, but the memories of the people I love are firmly rooted in this building. And although we'll change our buildings, we'll keep making memories - good and bad, but mostly good.
seldear: (Default)
While writing a poem to my mum, I made a realisation:

There've been people who only saw my opinions and actions and disagreed with them. Who wrote me off for who I was in the moment, because it wasn't who they wanted me to be.

And there've been people who saw my opinions or my actions and disagreed with them, but who saw who I could be. And they were willing to bank on who I might be in the future, not just who I was at the point in time where our perspectives clashed.

I understand the need to protect oneself - that we sometimes have to 'write off' people who aren't healthy influences in our lives. But I'm so, so grateful to the people who were - and are - willing to stick with me, and not dump me the first (or second, or umpteenth) time I said or did something they disagreed with.
seldear: (Default)
Fear is a physiological reaction. The tightness in my chest. The thickness in my throat. I'm 'safe' behind a computer screen, but I'm only as 'safe' as other people choose to let me be.

I've never been physically threatened for speaking out. I've never been stalked or hunted. The worst I've had to cop is textual abuse and rants, fannish shunning, and social backbiting.

But the possibility always exists, and given how my body is kicking into 'flight' mode when all I've done is link to something that certain groups will find offensive because it challenges their comfort zones, fear is a pretty effective tool at keeping people quiet.

I hate being afraid. But my throat is clogged anyway.
seldear: (Default)
1. I don't actually have anything scheduled on this weekend! A TOTALLY FREE WEEKEND. HOOOOOOLY COW. (Mind you, I'll spend it: cleaning up, appeasing cats, wondering why my stories won't write themselves, appeasing cats, working out what to do with all the food we have in the house, appeasing cats, quilting, and generally appeasing cats. This happens.)

2. This program should be working. It's not. It's probably due to some really stupid itty bitty syntax issue which the compiler won't tell me because this section of the system is ANCIENT and should have been junked and remade years ago.

3. That feeling when you've written something that's incredibly popular and you want to write a sequel, but you just can't imagine it being as good or as well-received as the original. (But you still have the ideas.)

4. The humbling realisation that I am rich in so many ways. Not least financially, but also in health, in family, in friends, in faith.

*hugs her online peeps*
seldear: (Default)
Only not in my world.

I've never had a problem with Valentines' Day. I'm cynical about it, naturally, but it doesn't bother me being single.

There's probably a number of reasons for this: my parents have never given me crap about being single, the chances of my finding someone to marry are low (if I want to marry someone who shares my faith, then there are many fewer Christian men than there are Christian women), my friends have generally been fairly inclusive of me after they got married, and my sisters are single, too.

Sometimes it bothers me a bit, more on the "I would have liked to give my mum grandkids" front, although, yes, BAD REASON TO PARTNER UP, YO. But I'm rarely lonely and never 'alone', although I do tend to be a solitary soul.

At any rate. For all my friends who 'made it' through V-Day (THE TACKY, THE TACKY, IT BURNS US, PRECIOUSS!) single, well-done and major *hugs*. For those who made it through with a partner - awesomesauce. Love each other well and hard 364 days of the year, and let the rest of the world celebrate your love, too, on V-Day.

...you know sometimes I think that if I hadn't discovered the internet, I might be partnered and married with kids by now.

On the other hand, I suspect my life would have been a lot less varied. :)

*hugs y'all*

I love you guys. Happy V-Day.
seldear: (Default)
I was participating in a conversation about size acceptance, prejudice, and living with ourselves. It was about body image, the food we eat, shape, size, and health, and the discussions were interesting at first.

Lately, it feels a bit like people are self-justifying their dietary decisions, health situations. A lot of the women in the thread are overweight, some because of diet, some because of metabolism, some because of genetics, some because of hormones, some because of a combination thereof.

A very angry note has grown in the posts - anger against the idea that our society deems it 'unacceptable' to be plus-sized, but also anger that people judge others not just by what they look like but by what they eat. So, me (1.6m/65kg) sitting down to a burger and fries is okay. But if I was the same height and 130kg, then people would look at me and say I was making unhealthy choices.

Frankly I'm still making unhealthy choices by eating a burger and fries, whether I'm 65kg or 130kg; but I'm less likely to be judged at 65kg.

Although one could argue that a burger (meat patty, cheese, egg, bacon, lettuce, tomato, onion, pineapple on sesame bun with BBQ sauce) is not terribly unhealthy other the the fats and oils from the meat, cheese, and bacon - which people would be eating anyway in, say, a ham and cheese sandwich, or an egg-and-bacon roll.

I understand the anger at one level. At another, well, it feels very bitter and self-righteous: "I'm going to eat what I want and you have no right to judge me on my choices!"

Or maybe that's just my privilege of being an Australian size 12? I've never had people judge me by what I eat, because the results are not apparent to people.

I'm not sure what I'm getting at here. I'm kinda struggling with the conversation at several levels all at once.
seldear: (Default)
Dear Matthew Johns,

DIAF. KTHXBAI.
The links may be triggery for some people - they relate to gang-banging in football culture, and sexual situations with questionable consent.

It's been pretty big news here in Australia, and by 'pretty big', I mean, cut for possible triggery ) kind of big.

--

On a more unusual theme: Atheists For Christianity - his experiences in Africa, rebuilding, supporting, developing.

--

Also, advertising to highlight discrimination?

I'm intrigued by the premise: to promote awareness of discrimination against fat people through comparison with other groups that also experience discrimination.However, I'm not entirely sure about the effectiveness of the result to the broader public since the initial displays of discrimination will throw people off-side before the message gets anywhere near finished.

I get what they're doing and how they're doing it; I'm just wondering if others do, too.

--

And finally, American breaches elected Myanmar leader's privacy: gets her in trouble with the Burmese Junta. I'm sorry, but Viet vet or not, how could sneaking into the house of a woman who's lived under house arrest for thirteen of the last nineteen years possibly be a good, useful, or helpful idea?
seldear: (Default)
Do we get to cherry-pick democracy?

democracy: majority rules )

And why do I do this to myself at 1:20am in the morning? Really? ACK.
seldear: (Default)
They liken this time to the Great Depression.

Strangely, what only a couple of commentators seem to have pointed out is the way society's structure changed during and after the Great Depression. Countries fell into nationalism, ultra-nationalism, xenophobia, facism. They retreated, became protective of their own interests, refused to listen to the cries of others in need.

And Germany looked for a scapegoat and found it in the Jews.

We like to think of ourselves as beyond that kind of thing. We're smarter than that. Educated. Progressive. Enlightened.

I'm not so sure. Society changes: people remain the same.

Nationalism, ultra-nationalism, xenophobia, the gradual removal of citizen's rights for 'the good of the country', the distrust of people who "aren't like us" whether visually (colour) or societally (religion).

Aren't we seeing these things again, now? In our own countries? Among our friends? Among ourselves?

One wonders, now, in the modern climate of social politics, who will we see in the "concentration camps" of the 21st Century. And whether we and those we like to think of as smart, educated, progressive, enlightened people will be the ones flipping the metaphorical switch on "those who are to blame for our troubles".

Society changes; humanity remains the same.

And the Nazis thought of themselves as smart, educated, progressive, enlightened people, too.
seldear: (Default)
Got my offer letter, non-compete agreement, and job description. Still a bit terrified.

*breathes*

seven year itch? )
seldear: (Default)
It's September already! I start my RTW trip in just over three weeks. I think that calls for an EEEEK!

I put a USB drive through the wash - it was in my jeans. Seems to have survived without trouble, though!

Yesterday, I discovered that I can write 2000 words in a day, cook, do the washing and washing up, surf a little internet, (mostly) resist Facebook, and fall asleep in the bath without drowning.

The falling asleep was unexpected.

--

books: CJ Cherryh and Philip Pullman )
seldear: (Default)
Where do you draw the line in abuse?

By abuse, I mean physical, emotional, or mental abuse - all of which are damaging in their own ways, usually on all three levels, even if the action's only on one of them.

In a book I was recently reading, a character dumped her boyfriend after he hit her the second time. The first time he hit her was allegedly an accident, but the second was definitely intentional. It helped that she wasn't really in love with him and was on the verge of dumping him anyway - ah, the convenience of storytelling!

Life isn't usually that simple.

People stay in relationships that turn abusive because of familiarity, because of habit, because of fear - fear of walking away into the unknown, fear of social disapproval, fear that the abuser is right and that's all that the recipient deserves.

So where do you draw the line? When does a reason become an excuse?
seldear: (Default)
On Gun Control by Dominic Knight, columnist of the Sydney Morning Herald.

He seems to walk a bit more of a middle road - and one that won't find much support from either side, I suspect. It's brief, but helpful in walking me through some of the thoughts and backgrounds involved in the whole discussion of gun control and how different people and different cultures see it.
seldear: (Default)
As I understand it, Australia has relatively strict gun control laws. I'm not sure exactly what those laws are, never having required the use of a firearm. (Any of the Aussies know?)

US Constitution's Second Amendment? Gun registration?

And where do you stand on the matter of "the right to bear arms" and why? Would love to hear from all sides of the fence and the pond.
seldear: (Default)
Allegedly written by Andy Rooney from 60 Minutes in the US.

a woman over thirty... )

*hugs* to the women-over-thirty on my f-list.
seldear: (Default)
One of these days I will stop being blurty-posty around here. And then you'll know I'm dead. :)

An interesting thought regarding Time magazine's Person Of The Year, 2006.

If a terrorist extremist is connected to the World Wide Web, taking control of his content in the Information Age and influencing those people around him, is he also Person Of The Year?
seldear: (Default)
By 'dissenting opinion' I mean offering at least one alternative view.

By 'arguing a point' I mean a back-and-forth exchange between two people holding different views.

[Poll #855567]
seldear: (Default)
I usually stay out of politics, although I read the political posts of my f-list with some interest. This caught my eye.

Question for the left-leaning people.

This isn't a hate meme. It's not an invitation to rant. This is an honest, inquiring question from one of my f-list and I'm interested in the answer, if you're willing to go and answer him politely.

I shouldn't have to emphasise the 'politely' bit, but given the state of US politics at this present time, I will.

ETA: Okay, maybe not as earnestly desiring to hear the other side's POV as I thought. Sorry, guys.

--

Nicely said!

Fanfic: force of nature

Ironically, I found this off the LJ of someone whose name came up because they LJ-unfriended me. ([livejournal.com profile] casapazzo) I hadn't read or commented to them in years, but found myself curious all the same.

Profile

seldear: (Default)
seldear

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 17th, 2025 11:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios