I had "explicit adult content" listed, and you probably have "use strict/moderate filtering" listed.
I've taken the explicit adult content off, although technically, I have NC-17 stories on the journal. I guess most people don't really care about it that much.
Hey, I wonder if arrietty was logged in at the time - otherwise, it does the whole You are about to view content that may only be appropriate for adults thing...
I read... somewhere that there's a bug in the cross-poster that's causing LJ coding (at least, I think it's just LJ coding and not regular HTML as well) to be stripped out when it's posted on LJ. It has been noted as a bug tho, and they're working on it.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 08:18 am (UTC)And when I look at it on my journal, it's not cut.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 08:21 am (UTC)This is very weird.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 08:42 am (UTC)Did the cut say something like You are about to view content that may only be appropriate for adults?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 10:46 am (UTC)You and one comm are the only ones who have this setting on my flist.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 11:30 am (UTC)I had "explicit adult content" listed, and you probably have "use strict/moderate filtering" listed.
I've taken the explicit adult content off, although technically, I have NC-17 stories on the journal. I guess most people don't really care about it that much.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 08:19 am (UTC)And when I look at it on my journal, it's not cut.
Curiouser and curiouser...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 08:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 08:41 am (UTC)*goes to open IE*
Nope. doesn't seem to make a difference.
Hey, I wonder if
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 09:00 am (UTC)But yeah, I never saw a cut either.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 04:18 pm (UTC)